Biff is the antithesis of Bernard Essay Example For Students

Biff is the antithesis of Bernard Essay Biff and Bernard are two contrasting characters in this play. As young boys, the differences between them are apparent. As grown men, the differences are subtle, but, Biff and Bernard are antithetical of one another. Thats because he likes you. If somebody else took that ball thered be an uproar. (p. 30)Willys response to Biff borrowing the football, gives Biff the idea that it is alright to steal as long as he is popular. In effect, Willy teaches his son that popularity and freedom to do what one wants go hand in hand. Bernard, however, is not as popular as Biff. Hes liked, but hes not well liked. (p. 33)Biff uses these words to refer to Bernard. The Lomans see Bernard as a pest, who will not amount to much because he is not well liked. Much like his father, Biff tends to embellish the truth. Well, I borrowed it from the locker room. (p. 29)This is Biffs response to Willy concerning the new football. Biffs response shows his dishonest nature. One sees that Biffs dishonesty continues into his adulthood when he steals the fountain pen of bill Oliver. Bernard, on the other hand shows that he is an honest young boy. When Willy demands that Bernard give Biff the answers for the exam, Bernard replies:I do, but I cant on a Regents! Thats a state exam! Theyre liable to arrest me. (p. 40)Even though Bernard looks up to Biff, he does not want to resort to cheating to help Biff pass the exam. Both Biff and Bernard have contrasting views of one another. One can see that Bernard idolizes Biff. Before Biffs big game in Ebbetts Field, Bernard asks if he can carry Biffs helmet. This shows that Bernard is willing to do anything for Biff even if it is a task as trivial as carrying Biffs helmet. Willy teaches Biff that is acceptable to use people if one is popular. Bernard is one of the many people that Biff manipulates. Let him carry the shoulder guards. (p. 88)Biff is speaking to Happy about allowing Bernard to carry some equipment. Biffs condescending attitude towards Bernard is demonstrated in this line. Biff believes the allowing Bernard to carry the shoulder guards is a great honour for Bernard. Even in adulthood, Biff and Bernard remain foils of one another. Biff displays a lack of maturity as a grown man. And dont say Gee. Gee is a boys word. A man walking in for fifteen thousand dollars does not say Gee! (p. 65)Biffs use of the word Gee displays his lack of mature vocabulary, thus, in Willys eyes, Biff appears to be immature. In Bernards speech to Willy about the turning point in Biffs life, one can see that Bernard maintains an air of maturity. Because Id thought so well of Biff, even though hed always taken advantage of me. I loved him, Willy, yknow? (p. 94)Even though he was manipulated by Biff, Bernard demonstrates maturity because he harbours no resentment towards Biff. The older Biff shows impatience when waiting to meet with Bill Oliver. Well, I waited six hours for him, see? All day. Kept sending my name in. Even tried to date his secretary so shed get me to him but no soap. (p. 104)Biff obviously believed that he really was salesman for Oliver and that Oliver would meet with him right away. Impatience caused Biff to go to great lengths to fulfill his appointment with Oliver. Contrary to Biff, Bernard displays patience, particularly in his conversation with Willy. Although, Willys replies are voiced angrily, Bernard manages to remain patient with Willy by not letting Willys anger bother him. .u73e655866b5212ed6ca0fdc49a220551 , .u73e655866b5212ed6ca0fdc49a220551 .postImageUrl , .u73e655866b5212ed6ca0fdc49a220551 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u73e655866b5212ed6ca0fdc49a220551 , .u73e655866b5212ed6ca0fdc49a220551:hover , .u73e655866b5212ed6ca0fdc49a220551:visited , .u73e655866b5212ed6ca0fdc49a220551:active { border:0!important; } .u73e655866b5212ed6ca0fdc49a220551 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u73e655866b5212ed6ca0fdc49a220551 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u73e655866b5212ed6ca0fdc49a220551:active , .u73e655866b5212ed6ca0fdc49a220551:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u73e655866b5212ed6ca0fdc49a220551 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u73e655866b5212ed6ca0fdc49a220551 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u73e655866b5212ed6ca0fdc49a220551 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u73e655866b5212ed6ca0fdc49a220551 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u73e655866b5212ed6ca0fdc49a220551:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u73e655866b5212ed6ca0fdc49a220551 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u73e655866b5212ed6ca0fdc49a220551 .u73e655866b5212ed6ca0fdc49a220551-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u73e655866b5212ed6ca0fdc49a220551:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Psychology Term Paper On Freudud EssayIn his glory days, Biff is considered popular, athletic and good with his hands. Bernard, however, is weak, anemic and not very popular. Willy teaches Biff a false sense of self importance and believes:the man who makes an appearance, the man who creates personal interest, is the man who gets ahead. (p. 33)Biff blames this false sense of self-importance for his unprosperous life. And I never got anywhere because you blew me so full of hot air I could never stand taking orders from anybody! Thats whose fault is! (p. 131)Bernard, in Willys opinion, is not going to reach the same level success as Biff. Bernard can get the best marks in school, yunderstand, but when he gets out in the business world, yunderstand, you are going to be five times ahead of him. (p. 33)To Willys surprise, Bernard grows up to be a successful lawyer arguing cases in front of the Supreme Court. One can see that the success experienced in the lives of both biff and Bernard are antithetical. Throughout the play there are contrast between Biff and Bernard. At first one sees that Biff is popular and athletic and that Bernard is weak and unpopular. Later on one sees that Bernard grows up to be a great success and Biff grows up to be a disappointment. No matter how one perceives it, one can see that Biff is the antithesis of Bernard.

Plantation Slavery Essays - Slavery In The United States, Slavery

Plantation Slavery The warm climate, boundless fields of fertile soil, long growing seasons, and numerous waterways provided favorable conditions for farming plantations in the South (Foster). The richness of the South depended on the productivity of the plantations (Katz 3-5). With the invention of the cotton gin, expansion of the country occurred. This called for the spread of slavery (Foster). Slaves, owned by one in four families, were controlled from birth to death by their white owners. Black men, women, and children toiled in the fields and houses under horrible conditions (Katz 3-5). The slave system attempted to destroy black family structure and take away human dignity (Starobin 101). Slaves led a hard life on the Southern plantations. Most slaves were brought from Africa, either kidnapped or sold by their tribes to slave catchers for violating a tribal command. Some were even traded for tobacco, sugar, and other useful products (Cowan and Maguire 5:18). Those not killed or lucky enough to escape the slave-catching raids were chained together (Foster). The slaves had no understanding of what was happening to them. They were from different tribes and of different speaking languages. Most captured blacks had never seen the white skinned foreigners who came on long, strange boats to journey them across the ocean. They would never see their families or native lands again. These unfortunate people were shackled and crammed tightly into the holds of ships for weeks. Some refused to eat and others committed suicide by jumping overboard (Foster). When the ships reached American ports, slaves were unloaded into pens to be sold at auctions to the highest bidder. One high-priced slave compared auction prices with another, saying, "You wouldn't fetch ?bout fifty dollas, but I'm wuth a thousand" (qtd. in Foster). At the auctions, potential buyers would examine the captives' muscles and teeth. Men's and women's bodies were exposed to look for lash marks. No marks on a body meant that he or she was an obedient person. The slaves were required to dance or jump around to prove their limberness. Young, fair-skinned muttaloes, barely clothed and ready to be sold to brothel owners, were kept in private rooms (Foster). It was profitable to teach the slaves skills so that during the crop off-season they could be hired out to work. Although they were not being paid, some were doing more skilled work than poor whites were. The better behaved slaves were allowed to be carpenters, masons, bricklayers, or iron workers. The construction of bridges, streets, canals, railroad lines, public buildings, and private homes was made possible by using slave labor (Cowan and Maguire 5:44). Slaves had no rights. This was done to keep them from revolting against their masters or attaining too much power (Katz 3-5). They were not allowed to communicate with each other or have meetings of any sort. To leave the plantation, a worker was required to have a pass signed by the master and overseer. Slaves could not own property, although some masters authorized it. Knives, guns, or any kind of weapon was not allowed. Forced separation of family members was a constant, dreadful threat (Foster). "It was de saddes' thing dat ever happen to me," one slave recalls of the sale of her sister, whom she never saw again (qtd. in Foster). Blacks received harsher criminal sentencing than whites, regardless of the crime (Cowan and Maguire 5:17). Marriage between slaves was not legally recognized, but owners encouraged it because a more stable environment was created. Married couples with children were less likely to attempt escape. Unfortunately, there usually was not a suitable mate choice among the slaves, so most remained single (Starobin 7). Rebel slaves would recruit Indians, poor whites, and anti-slavery persons to attack all white men, women, and children (Starobin 123-26). These uprisings occurred with at least one major revolt per generation (Starobin 98). Most rebellions were led by skilled artisans and industrial workers. The slaves depended on midnight surprise attacks and support from many (Starobin 124). They would set fire to buildings; while the whites were extinguishing the flames, angry slaves would assault them from behind (Starobin 123-26). Owners were forced to "sleep with one eye open" in case the large masses of slaves decided to uprise (qtd. in Foster). On a much smaller scale, slaves expressed their hate by refusing their duties, performing slow and sloppy work, stealing goods, fighting with overseers, sabotaging machinery and tools, and resisting the white culture forced upon them (Starobin 98-99). Some attempted to run away. They sought refuge in mountains and swamps. Professional slave catchers used

How to Effectively Use Dialect in Fiction Writing

How to Effectively Use Dialect in Fiction Writing Dialect can be a powerful tool to help writers bring the characters they have created to life. A writer might use dialect, along with accent, to distinguish a characters unique way of speaking- and in doing so, illustrate their place of origin, cultural background, or social class. It is critically important to use this device with sensitivity, as imprudent application can do more harm than good.In the past, writers often used dialect in a way that devolved into stereotypes and other offensive characterizations- something that is unacceptable to todays readers- and also frequently impacted readability. While writers still use dialect today to create believable, authentic characters, the rules surrounding its use have changed and writers should be careful to avoid missteps.Dialect vs. accentBefore we delve into the topic, its important to understand what dialect is, and how it differs from accent. Dialect, according to Merriam-Webster, is a regional variety of language distinguished b y features of vocabulary, grammar, and pronunciation from other regional varieties and constituting together with them a single language. Accent, on the other hand, refers to an individuals distinctive or characteristic inflection, tone, or choice of words. Essentially, accent is the specific part of dialect that relates to how something is pronounced, so a characters accent is, therefore, part of his dialect.Is it necessary?As the use of dialect in your writing can be a double-edged sword, its important to first ask yourself if it is absolutely necessary for your characterization process. This website suggests that an easy way to determine whether you really need to use dialect is to answer the following questions:Is dialect integral to the story (for example, is it used to reinforce the main characters outsider status in a close-knit regional community)?Are there stereotypical expressions associated with the accent or dialect you should take care to contextualize, use sparingly or avoid?NowNovel.comA more considered approachOnce you have determined that dialect is truly necessary for your writing, you need to find a way to maintain your characters authenticity without crossing the line into caricature. This is especially a concern if the character you are creating is part of a culture other than your own.One way writers are circumventing this issue is the use of what is known as eye-dialect, which are nonstandard spellings of words that represent standard pronunciations. These words are pronounced phonetically the exact same way as the original word. In a dialect of people living in the Southern United States, some examples of eye-dialect might be: fur (for), tu (to), frum (from), deth (death), wuz (was), uv (of), and sez (says).When the reader sees the words, although they are slightly misspelled, they are easy to read because the misspellings are phonetically pronounced the same way the correct spelling is pronounced. Therefore, as the reader is reading th e words aloud in his or her mind, there is a natural connection and understanding that takes place. This stylistic choice the author made serves three functions:It makes it easier for the reader to read and understand.There is still characterization happening.As it is spoken and the misspelling is the authors choice (rather than the speakers), there is no insinuation regarding the class or education status of the speaker.In her thesis entitled Writing in Dialect in Fiction: A History and Study, childrens author Jennifer Sommer writes: The perpetual dilemma for the writer is to determine how far to go in accuracy in dialect without losing the reader.Throughout her thesis, Sommer traces the progression of the use of dialect throughout American literary history to the present day, where she admits there is much conflict for writers who seek to create authentic characters without crossing the lines of caricature through dialect. As an example of modern literature that gets it right, she mentions the book Somewhere in the Darkness by Walter Dean Myers, a book set in the Bronx with African American characters. She notes that the change in dialogue to reflect characterization is minimal, yet effective. Specifically, she discusses how the use of language in dialogue immediately causes the reader to begin reading the dialogue with understanding of the accent, especially through dropping certain words, using aint, and incorporating short, choppy sentences, without turning the characters into provincial curiosities:Day before yesterday, Maurice said. But check this out. Tony just nicked the dude and he was screaming and carrying on like he had stabbed him through the heart or something.No lie?Yeah, hey, look, you want to play some ball tonight?I dont know.You give up ball or something, man? Maurice looked at him sideways. We playing Richie and his crew.Ill see how Im feeling, Jimmy said.You aint going to play, Maurice said. You getting to be another jive dude, man.Somewh ere in the Darkness by Walter Dean MyersThis passage, in contrast to passages written in earlier, more controversial works like The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, show how dialect can be successfully used in fiction without going overboard, and thus creating caricatures or racially-charged stereotypes. Particularly, it can be accomplished through slang, eye-dialect, and dialogue that focuses more on syntax (the arrangement of words) than phonetic reinventions of words.When phonetic reinventions of words are used in the extreme, as exemplified in some early American literature, the result is a character that is portrayed as highly uneducated and of lower social status. This use of language can come across as offensive and stereotypical, thereby ruining an otherwise great story. In modern writing, the best way to avoid these problems is moderation and careful consideration of the connotations of a dialects use.Applying the new rulesA contemporary author who applies the new rules of d ialogue well is J.K. Rowling. Take, for instance, the dialogue of Hagrid, one of the most beloved characters of her Harry Potter series:I am what I am, an Im not ashamed. Never be ashamed, my ol dad used ter say, theres some wholl hold it against you, but theyre not worth botherin with. An he was right.Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire by J.K. RowlingHagrids dialect helps to build his character and distinguish him from other characters throughout the series. However, instead of being over-the-top and difficult to read, the dialogue that Rowling writes for Hagrid contains more eye-dialect and syntax variation than other characters. These small changes are enough to allow Hagrids voice to take on an authentic West Country English accent, as discussed in this article. Author J.K. Rowlings use of dialect for the character of Hagrid helps distinguish him from other characters.Author J.K. Rowlings use of dialect for the character of Hagrid helps distinguish him from other characters.Bes t practices for composing dialectAs a conclusion to Sommers thesis on dialect, the author offers several suggestions for maintaining authenticity of character dialect without veering into the realm of caricature or overt racism. Included in those suggestions, she posits that authors should:Avoid respellings that would mislead readers about the status of the speaker.Pepper a narrative with occasional uses of the dialect. For example, to illuminate a Cajun character, you might reference items specific to that culture such as jambalaya (a traditional Cajun dish), employ greetings and kinship terms that use non-standard English, such as, Hey Grand-pere (how a Cajun grandson might greet his grandfather), or incorporate Cajun French phrases like tu connais (you know), mais yeah (but yes), and cher/chere (dear) throughout the text.Let the reader know explicitly when the characters have changed language, such as Here the speaker turned to Jean Thompson, and changed his speech to English let ting the reader know exactly how educated or literate the character is when speaking in Standard English.Use well-known sentence structure (syntax) that exemplifies the dialect, such as in Cajun, Why should I be ashame of that, me?Writing in Dialect in Fiction: A History and Study, a thesis by Jennifer SommerFurther, Sommer agrees that the best person to write dialect is someone who grew up or lives within the particular area or subculture that uses it. In such, a writer such as Paul Lawrence Dunbar was (in a sense) justified in using African American dialect in his writing, while Mark Twain was not. This could potentially explain why Twains books have been banned in several places because the diction (word choice) and dialect used were considered offensive and unsuitable for a more informed, aware, modern audience.A final noteUltimately, dialect via uncommon syntax and alternate spelling of words can be a compelling way to differentiate characters and build characterization- as lon g as its use is limited, readability is maintained, and careful consideration is given to how it is applied.

Experimental Designs II Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Experimental Designs II - Assignment Example For example, in a 2x2 factorial ANOVA with levels A1 and A2 of Factor Aand levels B1 and B2. An ANOVA test would test the significant differences between the marginal means, which are called simple Main Effects of each factor. This is because they illustrate the overall difference between the levels of each factor, independently of the levels of the other. The ANOVA also tests for the significance differences between the Cell Means; in other words, the four means relevant to the AxBinteraction effect (Jackson, 2012). According to Jackson, the test also determines if the effects of the independent variable (IV) are independent of each other, or whether the effects of one IV depend on the level of the factor. Key effects are differences in means over levels of one factor that is collapsed over levels of the other factor (s) (Jackson, 2012). No.6 The difference between a complete factorial design and an incomplete factorial design is laid out in how experimental conditions are dealt wit h. A Complete Factorial Design (CFD) consists of all factors and levels of each factor, it is also capable of estimating all factors, and their interactions (Jackson, 2012). An incomplete factorial design is arrived at when experimental conditions are removed from a complete factorial design. ... No.8 The difference between a two way ANOVA and a three-way ANOVA is that a two-way ANOVA test is used when there are more than one IV requiring multiple observations for each IV. The two-way test determines the main effect contributions of each IV and indicates if there is a significant interaction effect amongst the IVs. The three way ANOVA is used to determine the effect of three nominal predictor variables that are based on a continuous outcome variable. The three-way test evaluates the effect of the IV on the expected outcome together with their relationship in the outcome (Jackson, 2012). Random factors are considered to have no statistical impact on a given data set, unlike systematic factors that are considered to hold statistical significance. No. 10 Source df SS MS F A 1 60 60 1.420 B 2 40 20 24.170 AxB 2 90 81 0.125 Error 30 200 100 1.884 Total 35 390 261 27.599 a). Factorial notation –1x2 = 2 b). There are 2 conditions in this particular study. c). Number of subjec ts in the study – 3 d). Main effect for B, no significant interaction Source df SS MS F A 2 40 20 0.85 B 3 60 18 9 AxB 6 150 130 0.867 Error 72 150 75 Total 83 400 243 15.717 a). Factorial notation – 2 x 3. b). There are 6 conditions. c). Subjects in study - 2 d). No main effects. There is a significant interaction. Source df SS MS F A 1 60 60 132 B 2 40 20 98 AxB 2 90 45 135 Error 30 200 6.67 Total 35 390 131.67 245 a). Factorial notation – 1 x 2 b). There are 3 conditions. c). Subjects in study - 2 d). Main effect for B. No significant interaction. Source df SS MS F A 1 10 10 0.10 B 1 60 60 30 Error 36 80 40 Total 39 150 110 30.10 a). Factorial notation – 1 x 1 b). 1 condition c). Subjects in study - 1 d). Main effect for A and B. Significant

Analyzing Ragged Dick and comparing its depiction of status and Essay

Analyzing Ragged Dick and comparing its depiction of status and identity with that of Black Protest and the Great Migration and - Essay Example The boundaries which are created through each story show how culture is based on creating divisions within society because of stereotypes, status and ways in which relates to material goods. The first concept related to identity and status and the divisions which this creates in American society comes from the ideal of class. In each of the stories, there is a division of class which occurs, specifically between the lower, middle and higher classes. The point which is made with each of these classes shows that this is based on wealth and money, which allows any individual to change their class if they can make wealth. When these specific classes clash or the information about wealth is recognized, then it creates the division. For instance, in â€Å"Ragged Dick,† Dick is known to have lived on the streets and without a home; however, if this is disclosed to those in the middle class, which he is trying to turn to through wealth and money, then it will create division. For inst ance, when he is seen walking with Frank, there is recognition that Frank has a wealthy home while Dick has been on the streets.1 This information shows the divisions between class and how it turns from financial situations into social status. The concept of social status and the relationship to wealth is not only important in determining divisions between rich and poor. The concept of status created more divisions that were based on other stereotypes created within American society. One’s identity was furthered with divisions of color, race and the area which one was from, such as displayed in â€Å"The Great Migration†.2 This story is similar to that of Dick’s, specifically because the looks which one has and the ethnicity which they belong to create the same division. The identity then relates to the class which one belongs to. The revelation in this story is important because it defines not only divisions created in American society through race, but shows h ow society has created the boundaries of identity beginning with stereotypes of race, then leading to wealth expectations, neighborhoods which one should live in and the lifestyles which one has. Each of these attributes of division are seen with the movie â€Å"Lady and the Tramp† as a way of showing how the identity and status become a sense of conflict. The main plot of this story shows how a dog from the other side of the tracks falls in love with a mongrel from the other side of town. When looking at the division between these two, it can be seen that there are complexities with wealth, looks, race and the class divisions between the two. The boundaries are based on the identification of several attributes which are incorrect in the two being together3. This creates the central conflict in the story and shows how division is based on the superficial identities which are created in society. The differences which occurred within in society and identity, all which are divid ed according to the wealth, ethnicity and identity of an individual, come into conflict when the stereotypes of class are no longer effective. The economic, social and political concepts tie together, specifically because of the status which is held. If one has a specific social status based on wealth, then begins to change into a

Christian Ethics in A Complex World Essay Example for Free

Christian Ethics in A Complex World Essay In 2002 the book entitled â€Å"Choosing the Good: Christian Ethics in A Complex World† was by Dennis Hollinger was published. It gives an overview of the Christian ethics in today’s complicated world. It is indeed a precious and unique book that assesses the framework and perspective of Christian ethics in relation to social issues. The approach is designed to widen initial ideas about relations among different races, policies, human sexualities, economics and many more. The approach of the author is very unusual that made the book more likeable. Hollinger wanted to connect his beliefs to his readers in a way that he wanted to imply something in choosing to do what is good and right. In every social issue at hand there is always an equivalent step by step framework to be followed. The book’s weakness are the lengthy statements that bores readers easily, It may mislead readers since comprehension may be hard to acquire. It would be better if the author wrote it in a direct to the point manner. There are cases presented in the book that aids readers how to carefully analyze a real life scenario. It would be better for people not to complicate things as it is better if problems are looked down easily. In general the book is awesome since it tackles about foundations of ethical theories. Hollinger outlines much of the essential data needed so that readers will understand the areas of pastoral care, Christian ethics and its interconnection with public policy. An overall generalization is also given to see what does the author wanted to imply in this beautiful book. There were also judgments and ethical commitments presented in the second chapter of the book. The issues involving postmodernity and modernity treatment s discussed. But this is the chapter that lacks focus because vague explanations were given on how the society operates in modernity but does not make t in academics. The enticing part is that third part of the book presents figures about history tht guides readers on deciding in this contemporary world. A survey of recent Christian Ethics by Edward LeRoy is part of the book for readers to see an accurate statistics of the public’s opinion. Biblical ethics is also presented that shows a deeper connection of choosing to do the good things in life. The best reference is still the Holy Scriptures. Talking about culture and its relation to faith is also presented by Hollinger in this book. He cited examples like the delineation of Christ and Culture by Niebuhr and how the church is placed in the center of a more organized society. Christ should still stand up amidst the complexities of things I every culture. As the author concludes the book â€Å"the moral task before the Christian church today is immense. But God has called us, as he called Esther long ago in Persia, to be a divine presence for such a time as this† (Hollinger, 2002). For good to succeed it is our duty to devote our moral commitments against the complex world. It is in humility that people can find goodness and it is God who is the true foundation of everything we do (Hollinger, 2002, p. 272). The book is designed to let readers be aware that choosing good should incorporate a broad and deep understanding of the word goodness. Having reflections on the book made it easier for readers to understand what he is trying to point out. It is recommended to discuss a book like this in the classroom scenario so that all students ma practice the ethics of goodness inside the classroom and spread it outside as they grow. References: Hollinger, D. (2002). Choosing The Good: Christian Ethics in A Complex World. USA: Baker Academic

Human Growth Hormones Effects on Normal and hGH Deficient Children Ess

Human Growth Hormone's Effects on Normal and hGH Deficient Children What is Human Growth Hormone? Human Growth Hormone (hGH) has many uses with today's medical technology. For instance, hGH has proven to be very useful in treating Chronic Renal Insufficiency and Turner's Syndrome in girls (http://www.novo.dk/backgrou/backgrou/bahghuk.htm). Promising studies have also been performed and completed using hGH to quicken the repair of wounds, torn cartliage, and non-healing fractures, as well as treating juvenile rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthosis (http://www.novo.dk/backgrou/backgrou/bahghuk.htm). Perhaps Human Growth Hormone's most vital and "popular" function is treating children with a deficiency in their natural hGH levels and children who are shorter than their peers but have no hGH deficiency. Human Growth Hormone is a hormone produced in the pituitary gland of humans and is secreted throughout a person's life. hGH is important in children during their years of growth and in adult metabloism (http://www.novo.dk/backgrou/backgrou/bahghuk.htm). hGH is a protein consisting of 191 amino acids, with a molecular weight of 21,700 (http://www.eng.rpi.edu/dept/chem-eng/Biotech-Environ/FUNDAMNT/human.htm). What is Growth Hormone Deficiency? Growth Hormone Deficiency is defined as disorders of the hypothalamus, pituitary, or of growth hormone (GH) secretion and metabolism which result in short stature (http://www.icondata.com/health/pedbase/files/GROWTHHO.HTM). A Growth Hormone Deficiency may occur at any time during infancy or childhood, with the most obvious sign being a noticeable slowing of growth (http://www.medhelp.org/web/disframe.htm). Incidence of a GH deficiency is 1/4,000-10,000, and males have more oc... ...tature Caused by Growth Hormone Deficiency. Journal of Pediatrics, 130:205-209. Rosenfeld, R.G. (1997). Is Growth Hormone Just a Tall Story? Journal of Pediatrics, 130:172- 173. Sandberg, D.E. et al. (1994). Growth Hormone: Not For All Short Children. Pediatrics, 94:832-840. Links http://php2.silverplatter.com/physicians/digest/abstract/abst73.htm http://www.gene.com/pressrelease/1981/1_12_81.html http://www.endo-society.org/pubaffai/factshee/shrtstat.htm http://www.immunet.org/immunet/atn.nsf/page/ZQX22601.html http://www.eng.rpi.edu/dept/chem-eng/Biotech-Environ/FUNDAMNT/human.htm http://www.novo.dk/backgrou/backgrou/bahghuk.htm http://www.medhelp.org/web/growth.htm http://www.medhelp.org/web/disframe.htm http://laran.waismen.wisc.edu/fv/www/lib_grow.htm http://www.icondata.com/health/pedbase/files/GROWTHHO.HTM